(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.12 2016구단10607

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.12 2016구단10607

추가상병불승인처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 3, 2015, the Plaintiff, a subcontractor of a promotion company, was employed as a daily employed worker in the United Nations, and performed the duty of cleaning hot materials at the construction site of the NF3 1250MPPPPPPPP Plant in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.

B. On November 12, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to medical care from the Defendant on January 14, 2016 (hereinafter “instant approved disease”) on the following occasions: (a) the instant accident was caused by the wind (78 cm x 180 cm) with the face of the brin (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (b) the Defendant was approved to receive medical care for “the brace, the boom, the boom, and the boomed salt (hereinafter “instant approved disease”).

C. After that, on January 21, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury to the “foreign chromosome damage and cerebral cerebral cerebrovascular.”

(hereinafter “instant additional injury and disease”). D.

On February 11, 2016, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that the causal link with the instant accident is not recognized on the ground that it could not be confirmed as at the time of the instant accident, as at the time of the instant accident, the said application cannot be confirmed.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case"). . [Grounds for recognition] . [In the absence of dispute, each entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 6 through 9, and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 8, 9 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was diagnosed as the additional disease of this case since the plaintiff was faced with the inner part and the head part of the plaintiff at the time of the accident of this case, and symptoms, such as boom, saly, sad, sad, sad, sad, and memory degradation, etc. were revealed. The additional disease of this case was caused by the accident of this case, and thus, the disposition of this case which approved the non-medical care was unlawful.

(b)The facts of recognition are as follows: Gap evidence 3 to 9, Eul evidence 3 and 4; and

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2018.01.12 2016구단10492

-대구지방법원 2017.05.19 2015구단10990

-서울행정법원 2018.11.08 2017구단63712

-대구지방법원 2017.12.15 2015구단1507

-대구지방법원 2016.02.17 2013가단47283