logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.11 2014고단1100
업무상횡령등
Text

The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment was finalized on March 11, 2014. From May 1, 2013 to June 16, 2013, the Defendant served as a salesperson at the E-store operated by the victim D from May 1, 2013 to the victim D, while engaging in the work of calculating the price of goods and managing stores.

1. On May 16, 2013, the Defendant, at the above convenience store, embezzled 893,440 won in cash, 5,000 won in cultural products, which is owned by the victim and was in custody for the victim upon delegation of store management from the victim D, and embezzled 10 copies in cultural products rights, 10,000 won in cultural products and 12,00 won in market value at will.

2. The Defendant charged KRW 500,000 on the said card by inserting one copy of T-My (T-Money) card without paying the charging fees at the above time and place, and by inputting 500,000 won on the T-My Card charging machine, which is an information processing unit at that place, and inserting one copy of the said card on the T-My Card charging machine, which is the information processing unit at that place, and inserting 50,000 won for the said machine.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to 500,000 won by inputting information into a computer and other information processing device without authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Investigation report (cases concerning the calculation of the amount of damage), investigation report (victim's telephone statement) (No. 7, 9)

1. Previous convictions: Application of the accused's legal statements and investigation reports (Attachment to judgments of the first instance court in cases among the accused's trials);

1. Relevant Articles 356 and 355 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of occupational embezzlement) and Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act exempted from punishment;

arrow