1. The Defendant’s KRW 388,374,530 as well as annual 6% from December 12, 2012 to July 11, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On or around June 7, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Jeonbuk University affiliated with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant school”): High voltage A, and the place of electric use: 14,000kW, contract power: 14,000kW, contract equipment: By applying for the extension of 14,000kW to the Defendant on or around March 25, 201, the above contract power was changed to 20,000kW, and the measurement voltage was changed to 20,000W, around July 2012: 22,905 (hereinafter “instant contract for electric use”). From that time, the Plaintiff supplied the instant electric power to the instant school in accordance with the instant contract for electric use.

B. The Samsung Culture Center of the Jeonbuk University (hereinafter “the instant cultural center”) was established for the purpose of the purpose of the establishment of the Jeonbuk University Development Support Foundation, a foundation incorporated under the instant school. After completion of September 1, 1998, various cultural, artistic, academic events, etc. were permitted and managed, and welfare projects for school personnel and students have been performed.

C. The cultural center of this case is divided into large theaters completed around September 1, 1998 and small theaters completed on or around November 2, 1998, and its main facilities are large performance halls, small performance halls, viewing rooms of small performance halls, exhibition halls, and stage facilities. The above main facilities occupy most of the cultural center of this case, and are rent for holding various performances and exhibitions, such as music meetings, drama, musical music, dance, etc. The cultural center of this case's rental rate from 2008 to 2010 to 2010 to 77%.

On November 201, the Plaintiff’s comprehensive audit results show that the educational facilities accounting firm is a party to a contract for electrical use, and the Plaintiff’s basic educational facilities and students are mainly used for teaching and learning activities.