1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. From November 16, 1984, the Plaintiff supplied electricity to both the outdoor breeding facilities and the management building of the Busan Fisheries University (hereinafter referred to as the “instant school”) established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “instant fish farm”) on the terms of the contract for each type of agricultural power and the contract power of 80KW.

B. The fish farm of this case is currently used for the purpose of aquaculture research and development, aquaculture education, and fish experiments and practice, and fish farms for supporting experiment and practical training fish, which are classified into the management room, laboratory, indoor laboratory, indoor laboratory, seminar, seminars, management room, water quality control room, animal processing room, and machine-processed room.

C. At the time of November 16, 1984, according to the Plaintiff’s electricity supply regulations (electric power used directly for fish: power used directly for fish) and the actual use of the fish farm in this case at the time of the instant school, it is unclear whether the use of the fish farm in this case is subject to the supply of agricultural power for farming use.

On February 10, 192, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for electrical use (hereinafter “instant supply contract”) with the following terms and conditions upon the application for electrical use of the instant school (hereinafter “instant supply contract”), and supplied the electric power for agricultural use to the instant fish farm.

Power users: The area at which the Busan Fisheries University is admitted: The area at which the electricity is used for the use of electricity of high-tension power for education: 1,000K contract period: the application of electricity charges from February 10, 1992 to February 9, 1993: the name and other matters in accordance with the provisions of Article 72 of the Electricity Supply Regulations.

1. If the plaintiff and both of the schools of this case do not raise an objection to this contract within the contract term, it shall continue every one year after the expiration of the contract term.