logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.04.03 2020고단117
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 절도, 절도미수 피고인은 2019. 10. 26. 08:45경부터 08:46경 사이에 대전 대덕구 B빌라 맞은편 노상에 세워져 있던 피해자 C 소유인 D K5 승용차의 잠겨있지 않은 문을 열고 그 곳 뒷좌석에 있던 피해자 소유의 베이지색 FILA 운동화 1켤레, 아이팟 시리얼번호가 적혀 있는 상자 1개를 가지고 가 절취한 것을 비롯하여, 그 무렵부터 2019. 11. 5.경까지 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 총 5회에 걸쳐 합계 360,000원 상당의 금품을 절취하거나 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 미수에 그쳤다.

2. On October 29, 2019, the Defendant violated the Fraud and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, at the “G” restaurant for the victim F’s operation in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, where the Defendant had a legitimate right to use the card, presented the post office check in the H’s name as if the Defendant had a legitimate right to use the card, and used the stolen physical card, such as a sea wave station with an aggregate of KRW 9,000,000, from the victim F, and used the stolen physical card.

3. Attempted fraud.

A. On October 29, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 11:53 on October 29, 2019, at the “K Burial” operated by the Victim J in Daejeon-dong-gu, Daejeon-gu, the Defendant attempted to receive two cigarettes of tobacco to be done by presenting a post office check in the H’s name, such as the list Nos. 2 attached to the crime list, which was stolen, as the Defendant had a legitimate right to use the card; (b) however, the Defendant did not intend to do so on the wind that does not constitute a card payment upon a theft report.

B. On November 4, 2019, the Defendant, at around 08:29, intended to receive tobacco and booming, etc. by presenting a credit card of a new bank owned by Nan-owned Nan-owned, which was stolen, as stated in the [Attachment List No. 3], at around 08:29, the victim’s name unclaimed L in Seo-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon, as the Defendant had a legitimate right to use the card. However, it is the wind that does not constitute a credit card settlement due to the theft report.

arrow