logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017.10.27 2015나12399
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties’ relevant Defendant Incorporated Foundation B (hereinafter “Defendant Incorporated”) is an organization that establishes and operates a hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and Defendant C is a person who takes charge of the Plaintiff’s medical treatment as a doctor of the psychotropic surgery who works in the Defendant Hospital.

B. On Nov. 13, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an appeal for a small number of mixed symptoms at the Defendant Hospital’s emergency room, around 20:45 on the same day. The Plaintiff, at around 20:30, went beyond her home and brought an appeal for a small number of combined symptoms.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital observed the “phomatic re-defluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoral re-fluoring” as a result of brain-T

Defendant C treated the Plaintiff on the same day at around 21:48, and recommended the Plaintiff and his guardian to hospitalized treatment, stating that “At present, there is no neological symptoms, hairs, drums, etc., but there may be decline in consciousness and need for surgery at the time of increase in the blood transfusion in the future.”

C. (1) On November 13, 2010, the Plaintiff was transferred from the emergency room to the hospitalization room at around 22:15, 2010. (2) According to the nursing record prepared by the nurse in charge of the Defendant hospital, the nurse in charge was transferred from November 22:15, 2010 to the hospitalization room and entered the Plaintiff’s status as follows. The nurse in charge inspected the Plaintiff from November 22:15, 2010 to 03:45 on the following day. The Plaintiff had 3 times discussed the Plaintiff during the same period, and had 3 times body body, and had sprinked the beer.

On November 13, 2010, the Plaintiff’s condition of time inspection 150/100, blood pressure 150/100, body temperature 36.2, beer Park 86, respiratory on November 13, 2010, blood pressure 130/70, body temperature 37.22, beer Park 100, respiratory 22:15 meters in pactabbbb, bifine 22:5 meters in pactab, and 160/90, body temperature 36 degrees, beer, 104, and 104.

arrow