Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:16, February 8, 2015, Defendant A reported that he was unsatured by the Defendant on the side of the public parking lot set forth in 21 (Yodong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-ro 21) on the ground that he was unsatured by the Defendant, Defendant A, upon receiving a fighting report from 112, was subject to removal from the E and E and E and E of the Annbbbbbbbbbbb in the Ansan Police Station D District called out to the said area, the Defendant she satddd the instant E-gro, and sated the right buckbbbbbbbbbbbbs. The Defendant satd the instant F’s satch at one time, and satn the bomb.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, committed an assault by Defendant B, as stated in Paragraph 1, by reporting the form of his wife A who abused a police officer’s control over said F, and assaulting F’s f’s blaps.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's 112 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. A copy of the work log;

1. Application of the statutes governing the case-related photographs

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine)

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that Defendant A [the scope of recommendation] does not have the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (the decision of sentence] [the decision of sentence] in light of the specific circumstances and methods of the crime of this case, the crime of this case is not suitable.

However, there is no record that the defendant was punished in the Republic of Korea, and the defendant was committed.