2016Nu4750 Revocation of revocation of the decision to disclose information

Government Legal Service

The Minister of Environment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2015Guhap10964 decided May 12, 2016

September 1, 2016

September 22, 2016

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The part concerning the information related to the Plaintiff among the information disclosure decision made by the Defendant on September 8, 2015 to September 1, 2015 with respect to "the appointment of an attorney of the Ministry of Environment from September 2012 to 2014" and the part concerning the information related to the Plaintiff among the information disclosure decision made by the Defendant on September 16, 2015 to September 16, 2015, including the Ministry of Environment attorney and advisory attorney-at-law, shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is the same as that of the first instance judgment, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the grounds asserted in the first instance court while filing an appeal by the plaintiff do not significantly differ from the contents asserted by the plaintiff in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are examined, the judgment rejecting the

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, judge and assistant judge;

Judges Cho Hun-tae

Judges Kim Gin-ran