logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.3.24. 선고 2015누66501 판결
사업장변경허가신청불허처분취소
Cases

2015Nu6501 Revocation of permission for change of place of business

Plaintiff Appellant

A

Defendant Elives

The Administrator of the Gyeonggi Local Labor Agency;

The first instance judgment

Suwon District Court Decision 2014Guhap6563 Decided October 20, 2015

Conclusion of Pleadings

March 10, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

March 24, 2016

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's rejection of an application for change of place of business against the plaintiff shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the grounds alleged in the court of first instance while appealed by the plaintiff, are not significantly different from the contents alleged in the court of first instance, and all the evidence submitted in the court of first instance are examined, the

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed in an unlawful manner, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge, judge and assistant judge;

Judges Hun-Ba

Judges Kim Gin-ran

arrow