beta
Text
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) As regards KRW 10,275,800 and its 10,000,000 among them, from March 10, 2015 to the remainder;
Reasons
1. The facts of recognition consist of three subject matters of lawsuit, such as the Plaintiff’s claim for reimbursement of expenses incurred in relation to accommodation, etc., claim for property damage caused by denial of reappointment, and claim for consolation money. However, the basic facts of each of the above subject matter of lawsuit are closely related, and the facts of each of the above subject matter of lawsuit are examined at once.
A. On March 1, 2004, the Plaintiff was appointed as a tourism management and full-time lecturer at C University (hereinafter “instant University”) on March 1, 2004, and was promoted to an assistant professor on April 1, 2006, and was reappointed on March 1, 2010 (four years). The Defendant is a school foundation that establishes and operates C University.
B. On May 2, 2012, the Plaintiff, as a tourism management and guidance professor of the instant university, submitted to the Defendant a plan for “the Hong Kong, the Mcaro, and the China Sea Area Overseas Training” for the instant university tourism management and the first-year students (hereinafter “instant overseas training”) (hereinafter “instant overseas training”).
(2) Although the instant overseas training is included in the academic schedule, the instant overseas training is basically a part of the training participant’s expenses, and the Defendant bears the Defendant’s burden. (2) On May 4, 2012, the Defendant submitted the instant overseas training participant to the tender, and on May 23, 2012, the tax travel agent Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Sriju Tour”) was selected as the final successful bidder. On June 7, 2012, concluded a travel contract with the head of the tax office and the amount of the travel to KRW 958,00 for each student (48 persons scheduled to be the initial bidder) and the number of departures is to be calculated on a unit price per student.
3) On June 11, 2012, the Defendant paid KRW 21,070,000 for airline tickets to the Sejong Tour Co., Ltd., but the Sejong Tour Co., Ltd. was not issued an airline ticket at the time and failed to deliver it to the Defendant. Meanwhile, the Sejong Tour revoked the hotel reservation on the same day. (4) On the same day, some of the students participating in the overseas training of this case were to receive airline tickets and hotel boxes on June 12, 2012.