logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.15 2014가단5336399
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B’s KRW 30,498,00 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from August 10, 2012 to December 22, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who worked as an employee in the Han Port Co., Ltd. with the travel business as its business purpose (hereinafter “IB”), and the Defendant Digital Port Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company having a transaction relationship with one Port. Defendant B is a person who works as an employee in charge of the hotel and AB business in the Defendant Company.

B. On January 2012, Defendant B made a false statement to the Plaintiff via the Internet Messenger, stating, “The local employee of Hong Kong would make a promise to make a hotel, and make a transfer to the Plaintiff immediately if he deposits expenses in lieu of the payment.”

However, the above defendant has no intention or ability to repay the price of other reservations even if it is requested to pay the price in advance, because it is difficult for the defendant to pay the price in advance by using the price of other reservations individually.

C. Defendant B is above B.

In the same manner, around March 27, 2012, the Plaintiff had the Plaintiff pay KRW 1,265,00 for hotel reservation as well as around August 10, 2012, and had the Plaintiff pay KRW 30,498,000 on a total of six occasions from that time until August 10, 2012 as indicated in the list of crimes.

1,265,00 hotel reservation 220-3-29 Hong Kong airline tickets 2,840,000 Hong Kong airline tickets 32012-6-6-20,580,204 4204 2012-7-723 13,039,039,600,6066206-6,2229,000 the detailed airline tickets of the 2012-7-31, 2005 ice 2012-7-31, 13,039,60,606 2012-8-10,229,000,000

D. Defendant B is above C.

In a criminal trial that was prosecuted by deceiving approximately KRW 65 million from four victims, including the facts of subsection (1), the sentence of imprisonment for up to 8 months was finalized.

【Defendant B’s ground for recognition: The Defendant Company deemed to be a confession: The absence of dispute, each entry and pleading of Party A’s evidence (including the serial number, hereinafter the same shall apply).

arrow