Text
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part on Plaintiff AX is revoked, and the Plaintiff AX’s claim is dismissed.
2. The defendant's plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is either dismissed, added, or deleted as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the defendant, except for further determination as to the defendant’s assertion as set forth in paragraph (3) below. As such, it
2. The 3rd to 16th of the judgment of the first instance shall be applied to the parts used for cutting, adding, or deleting, as follows:
The defendant provided card customer information to B without converting it.
B Employees stored the above card customer information on the computer for business purposes and used the above card customer information in the manner of sharing the stored pool.
"First Instance 3 to 4, the first instance court's first instance court's third 18 to 5 are followed as follows.
"A" came to know that the defendant E Center could store files linking USB Megale because security programs are not installed on its own business computer while conducting the FDS development work.
B. Around February 2013, Defendant E Center copied card customer information stored in the co-owned brand at Defendant E Center on its own computer for its own business without a security program, and it had been connected to Defendant E Center’s arbitrarily brought in the said computer and copied the personal information under the name of approximately KRW 5,378,00 to the above USB note.
C copied the above disclosed information at one’s own home, and then copied the information stored at the above computer on April 2013 to his/her own hard disc.
“Delivery” in Section 14 of the first instance judgment
“Delivery” was made.
"Ero-friendly".
The 10th to 10th of the first instance judgment shall be followed by the following:
"2. On June 20, 2014, the above court found C guilty of the facts charged and sentenced C to three years of imprisonment, and C appealed and appealed, but both.