logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.02.14 2017고단322
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 3, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Seoul Western District Court to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 as a crime of violating road traffic laws. On July 14, 2014, the same court received a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine for a crime of violating road traffic laws.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On July 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving of alcohol) driving a DNA car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.093% in a section of about 500 meters from the street telecom parking lot located in the Seocho-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si, Seoul, to the road front of the C cafeteria located in 05:58,58, on the same day.

As a result, the defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, was driving a drinking again in violation of the above provision.

2. On July 28, 2017, Defendant 1, who violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1, around 05:58, around July 28, 2017, was driven by Defendant 1, who is engaged in driving of the said vehicle, and was sent to C cafeteria from the side of the X-PP playground at the early c cafeteria.

At the same time, there was a section where the U-turn is not allowed due to the center line of the yellow-ray, and there was another vehicle passing through the place, so in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has the duty of care to safely operate the vehicle by checking the passage of another vehicle in the section where the U-turn is allowed, and then the driver of the vehicle has the duty of care to safely

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and, as seen above, hered the center line in the section in which U.S. is not allowed under the influence of alcohol, and hereded the part of the Fone Star driver’s driving of the victim E (35 S) driven by one lane from the direction of X-ray to the center of X-ray in the direction where U.S. is not allowed under the influence of alcohol.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above work performance.

arrow