logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.03 2014가단211452
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 17, 2011, when 14 out of 32 dental hospitals were lost, only 18 dental clinics remaining, the Plaintiff first filed an appeal with the “Dental clinic” established and operated by a dentist C to the effect that the total amount of the existing music report files is high, inconvenience, and inconvenience due to the loss of the hivers of the upper right, and that the hivers were Chewing, and that consultation was received on the hivers procedure.

B. From November 23, 2011, at D dental clinics, the Plaintiff began to receive medical treatment from its affiliated dentists, and opened up 12 boxes over several times until April 11, 2012, and received treatment, such as the installation of upper scrap metal and the coordination thereof until January 18, 2013.

C. On April 1, 2013, the Plaintiff, who was admitted to the E University Dental Hospital, filed an appeal for the franchis infection on the malicious right-hand eggs, such as ① Ma15 dental services, ② Madern Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Ma15, ② Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon Madon.

At the time, the Plaintiff did not receive any specific treatment at the above university hospital, and on April 11, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a dental clinic again, and received several medical treatment until January 22, 2014.

On November 20, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) filed a request with the E-university Dental University Hospital to conduct an overall evaluation of the eggs planted at D dental clinics; (b) at the time, the pertinent university hospital Bocom and F professor diagnosed the Plaintiff’s contact with the central level of the teaching profession, and (c) the Plaintiff’s habitive tension with the central level of the teaching sector.

E. The Plaintiff’s installer and manager of a dental clinic was changed to Dental G on April 26, 2012 in the course of receiving treatment at D dental clinics for approximately two years, and again changed to H on August 13, 2013.

A dentist in charge of the plaintiff's treatment has been also changed several times, but defendant B has a fluort type.

arrow