The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of suspended execution for one year of imprisonment, nature protection activities, welfare facilities and group service activities, and service activities of public facilities) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s recognition of all of the instant crimes is against each other; each of the instant crimes is contingently low; the Defendant deposited certain money for the victimized police officers; and the Defendant’s economic situation is not sufficiently sufficient.

However, in order to protect legitimate performance of official duties and to establish sound social order, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties of the State requires strict punishment. Each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant interfered with legitimate performance of duties by police officers who performed official duties, and inflicted injury on the victimized police officers, and the quality of the crime is not weak. In particular, the defendant committed the same crime for a short period of time, not only two months but also two or more, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in 2008, and the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in 208, and there seems to be adequate for the defendant's community service work for 20 hours as sanctions against the same kind of crime as above. In full view of various circumstances such as the defendant's age, environment, occupation, family relationship, circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, and circumstances before and after the crimes, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.