The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant agreed with the victim of the crime of interference with business, and the health of the defendant is not good is favorable to the defendant.

However, in order to protect the legitimate performance of public duties of the State and establish a sound social order, the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is committed during the period of repeated crime, and each of the crimes of this case is committed during the period of repeated crime, and the defendant has a record of being punished several times as the same criminal acts, etc., considering the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, there are no special circumstances or circumstances newly considered in the sentencing after the sentence of the lower judgment, and there are no changes in the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, and various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the present arguments and records, such as the defendant’s age, character

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.