2016 Violation the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic Act (referring to the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc.)

A person shall be appointed.

Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju 1ro

Dayang-nam District in original domicile

Pump (prosecutions) and Cho Young-ju (Public Trial)

July 6, 2016

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant 200 hours, such as nature protection activities, welfare facilities, group volunteer activities, public facilities volunteer activities, etc.

order the community service of any member.

Criminal facts

The defendant is the owner of the building B ‘B' in the first place in the front city of Jeonju-si.

No person shall provide a place for sexual traffic or provide a building, etc. with knowledge of the fact that it is provided for sexual traffic.

Nevertheless, from May 2015 to February 12, 2016, the Defendant agreed to receive KRW 100,000 per month from two sexual traffic women, while being aware of the fact that they are provided for sexual traffic between the above B from May 2015 to February 12, 2016, and leased two said buildings to the said sexual traffic women, thereby allowing them to carry out sexual traffic.

As a result, the defendant provided a place of sexual traffic or knowingly provided a building for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A report on control of public morals establishments (B);

1. Letters;

1. On-site photographs, certified copy of the register, and family relation certificate;

1. Each investigation report;

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of criminal facts;

Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Selection of Imprisonment

1. Suspension of execution;

Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Social service order;

Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

Reasons for sentencing

In that the Defendant committed the instant crime even before and after having been sentenced to a fine of the same kind, three times before and after the suspension of execution, and even after having been one time before and after having committed the instant crime, the Defendant should be punished strictly, and the Defendant should be punished. However, considering the fact that the Defendant disposed of the building, and that the Defendant would not be punished again, the sentence should be determined as ordered, taking into account the fact that he/she would not be punished again.

Judges Demotion