A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 24, 2008, the defendant was issued a summary order of 2.5 million won by the Busan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Minging-out Driving), and a summary order of 3 million won by a fine at the Busan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Ming-out Driving).

【Criminal Facts】

1. On August 15, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.130% of the blood alcohol concentration without a vehicle driver’s license, even though he had been subject to punishment twice or more due to driving under the influence of alcohol. On August 22:47, 2015, the Defendant driven Bone Star car at a section of about 400 meters from the front side of the Taekdongdong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Busan Metropolitan City, for the same Do-dong, to the same Do-dong, from the 400-lane Do-dong, Do-dong to the same Do-dong Do-dong.

2. At the time stated in paragraph (1) above, the Defendant was found to have been aware of the driving under the influence of alcohol on the road prior to the head of Busan City/Do Police Station, which was under the influence of drinking on the road prior to the head of Busan City/Do Police Station, and the Defendant was found to have been aware of the fact of driving under the influence of drinking on the road prior to the head of Busan City/Do Police Station, and the Defendant stated the name of D in the column for the driver’s signature of the inquiry as a result of the control of driving under the influence of personal information terminal (PDA) as

Then, the Defendant had C, who is unaware of the circumstances, printed out the “Notice on the Result of Sound Driving Control” forged with D’s signature and bound it to the investigation record, and submitted the said C a report on the circumstantial statement of the owner-driver whose signature was forged.

Accordingly, the defendant forged D's signature for the purpose of exercising it, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A statement of occurrence of a traffic accident prepared by a defendant;

1. Report on detection of a drinking driver, report on the circumstances of a drinking driving, report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, notification of the control of drinking driving, and driving under the influence of alcohol.