1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following '2. Additional Judgment' as to the defendants' bona fide defense, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The Defendants asserts that even if the existence of the preserved claim is recognized, they constitute a bona fide beneficiary, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim is groundless.

On the other hand, the beneficiary's bad faith is presumed in the revocation litigation of fraudulent act, so that the beneficiary is exempted from liability, the beneficiary is responsible for proving his good faith.

In such a case, the good faith of a beneficiary shall be determined reasonably by comprehensively taking into account all the circumstances, such as the relationship between the debtor and the beneficiary, the details of and the background or motive for the act of disposal between the debtor and the beneficiary, the transaction terms and conditions of the act of disposal, the existence of objective materials supporting the act of disposal, and the circumstances after the act of disposal, etc.

(2) In light of the aforementioned circumstances and the following circumstances recognized by the evidence revealed earlier, the Defendants are deemed to constitute a bona fide beneficiary, given that the Defendants received each of the instant collateral security rights as collateral for credit sales claims without being well aware of the financial status of the Nonparty Company and A as a result of the increase in credit sales claims during the supply of drugs to the Nonparty Company, and thus, obtained the establishment of each of the instant collateral security rights as collateral for credit sales claims.

Therefore, since the defendants' good faith defense is well-grounded, one copy of the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is without merit.

The defendants are merely aware of A, the representative director of the non-party company in the course of commercial transactions with the non-party company, and they do not have any particular personal relationship between A and its officers and employees.