1. The part concerning the conjunctive claim in the first instance judgment shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim is dismissed.

3...

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiff sought the revocation of the above disposition in favor of the Defendant.

The first instance court dismissed the plaintiff's primary claim, and ② accepted the conjunctive claim, and only the defendant appealed, the subject of the judgment in this court is limited to the plaintiff's conjunctive claim.

2. Details of the disposition;

A. The court's explanation on this part of the cited judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, this shall be cited as it is, in accordance with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

B. Parts 1) 4, 11, 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 1, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 1, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply) of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as " June 3, 2015"), 4, 13, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 1, 4, 4, 1, 4, 4, 4, 1, 4, 4, 1, 4, 1, 4, 1, 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4,

In addition, the quality manager shall be determined by the division of the technical manager and the technical manager shall be able to hold concurrent office with the quality manager.

Therefore, when the plaintiff's elevator inspection takes at least two working persons for each workplace, the minimum working personnel for each workplace is required to be four persons.

In addition, only the origin of the question is recognized as an authorized inspection agency, and the remainder of three support shall not be issued.