1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit, including the part resulting from the participation in the lawsuit, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is an educational foundation that operates the C University, and the Defendant Litigation Intervenor (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a person who was appointed as a D and D full-time lecturer at C University on March 1, 1997 and served as a computer department or associate professor from March 1, 2005.

The intervenor selected E/F students on the recommendation of E/F students as scholarship subjects for the purpose of using them as club activity expenses, and demanded the scholarship received by students as club membership fees.

(hereinafter “Grounds for Disciplinary Action 1”). The Intervenor designated and managed the password of the Dong-ri official passbook (the opened on February 4, 2015, the E student name).

(hereinafter “Grounds for Disciplinary Action 2”). The sn beam project ( April 22, 2015) and CNC NC NC’s Project Group ( June 3, 2015) were purchased without agreement or consent with the students of Eastia by withdrawing the money deposited in the Dongi’s official account.

(hereinafter “Grounds for Disciplinary Action 3”) In order to register E students as research assistants in G projects, the Intervenor requested E students to provide personal information, such as resident registration numbers and office addresses by telephone, and instructed E students to sign to register E students as research assistants in G projects (G projects) without detailed explanation.

(hereinafter “Grounds for Disciplinary Action 4”). The Intervenor directly withdrawn KRW 20,000 out of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 for E’s personnel expenses, a research assistant of H project, and directly withdrawn KRW 4,330,00,00 among E’s personnel expenses (9,000,000,000), a research assistant of G

(hereinafter referred to as "grounds for disciplinary action"). (b)

On May 4, 2016, the Plaintiff dismissed the Intervenor for the following reasons.

C. On June 3, 2016, the Intervenor filed a petition review with the Defendant on June 3, 2016, and the Defendant, even though the grounds for disciplinary action against the Intervenor were recognized, was changed to three months from the suspension of disciplinary action for dismissal on the ground that he/she abused or abused

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [The grounds for recognition] does not dispute.