A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

A victim C (29) was a person working as an employee at the “E convenience store” located in Daejeon Peong-gu, Daejeon. Defendant was a guest with the above convenience store frequently, and Defendant was not good for the following reasons: (a) the victim was the victim’s speech and interfered with the convenience store business.

On September 14, 2016, at the above convenience store around 01:30 on September 14, 2016, the Defendant’s “the victim has been suffering from this point.”

The spits or spits spits the victim's face while taking a bath on the ground that the victim was ‘spits' and assaulted the victim by means of spits or spits.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Each written statement of C;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Each investigation report (referring to a police officer's investigation report, a report on the attachment of video CDs to the field, the securing of CCTV images, and a criminal investigation report related to A assault (i.e., a shot board);

1. Recording recording, recording, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order, argued that the victim who had been maliciously made by the defendant is first frighting, and that spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit, but according to the victim's investigation agency and the legal statement, the defendant spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spits the victim by gathering spit spit spit spit spit spit, and there is a head where the defendant deducts spit spit spits from the CCTV spit spit spit spit, and according to each evidence duly adopted by the police officer after sending CCTV to the scene at the time, it is sufficiently recognized that

It is advantageous to the fact that there is no record of the reason for sentencing, but it is committed by evidence such as the victim's statement and the police officer's photograph.