(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.30 2017고단1306

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.30 2017고단1306

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2017, from around 02:09 to around 03:35 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by force for about 90 minutes, such as drinking alcoholic beverages from “E operated by the victim D” in Sinsan-si, and drinking alcoholic beverages, and drinking them on the side, without any particular reason.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and time set forth in paragraph 1, and at the place set forth in paragraph 1, and the police officer’s slope G, who was dispatched to the police box of the Gyeongsan Police Station, prevented the Defendant from acting, and “mathing and returning home,” committed assault, such as spiting the face of the above H on one occasion, on his hand, by stating that “the inside is less than the width and more than the width and the punishment is too heavy.” The head of the above G was cut one time by hand, and immediately arrested the Defendant as the current offender of the interference with the performance of official duties, and Ha was arrested as the police officer in the patrol car, and Ha was spiting the face of the above H once.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the 112 reporting processing of police officers and the escorting of suspects.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of a defendant (the purport of recognizing the interference with the duties of a police officer and the spitation of nature on a police officer) (the act of rhying the head of a police officer);

1. Each legal statement of witness D and G;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant spits the spit of CCTV and CCTV CDs (the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the police officer did not take the head of the police officer, although he spits the spit.

In the case of the CCTV images, the upper part of the screen shows the back condition of the defendant, and the front side of the defendant's left side and the right side side of the police officer, respectively, and immediately after the defendant acted on the left hand, police officers control the defendant, and the restaurant relation in the front of the defendant with the partitions.

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2016.09.09 2016노1921

-대구지방법원 2016.01.07 2015고단5634

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.03.31 2020노2836

-창원지방법원 밀양지원 2018.01.25 2017고단174

-인천지방법원 2018.03.28 2018고단599