logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.05.04 2015고단6369
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2013, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a loan company with approximately KRW 180,000,000,000,000 for monthly salary; and (b) did not cover interest and living expenses on the above debt; (c) however, there was no loan company, etc. to receive additional loans; and (d) accepted the proposal that “I would like to have a loan from a loan company with approximately KRW 200,000,000,000 for the new annual salary from the first financial right to receive KRW 1,00,000 for the loan; and (c) there was no loan company, etc. to receive additional loans; (d) however, the Defendant received a proposal that “I would transfer the loan to a designated account; and (e) would transfer the fee after the transfer of the loan.”

Accordingly, at around 15:00 on June 14, 2013, the Defendant applied for a loan from the C Office located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, where the Defendant works as the head of the team, to D affiliated with the C Office of the victim, which is a corporation soliciting loans for three life insurance in the future, and confirmed that there is no intention to obtain a loan from other financial institutions when applying for a loan to three life insurance in the future.

There is no other financial institution's request for loans.

In the future, as of the point of time of the performance of the lending of three lifes, a letter of commitment stating that the lending will be immediately repaid to another financial institution during the 15 business days after the enforcement of the lending from five business days before the enforcement date of the lending to the victim company on the 18th of the same month.

However, the Defendant had already applied for a loan to another lending company by using the fact that it takes some time to share the loan information between the lending company, or was scheduled to receive a loan from the other lending company by applying for a loan to the other lending company immediately after the above loan is applied, and received the loan from the victim company.

arrow