A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 4, 2013, the Defendant applied for a workplace credit loan with the purport of borrowing 30,000,000 won from 30,000,000 won to 8.5% per annum to 1 year in the victim’s future at the Jongno-gu Seoul Loro Design Center for the Madicization Design Center located in 163, the Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu Seoul, to the employees in charge of the name and non-performance of 30,00,000 won in the victim’s future at the interest rate of 8.5% per annum and then

“In applying for a loan to three life in the future, I do not intend to obtain a loan again on one occasion by applying for a loan to another financial institution.

In the future, “a loan will be repaid regardless of whether the loan regulations of the company will be within the scope of the loan if the loan has been implemented by another financial institution between five business days before and after the enforcement date of the loan of three life in the future,” and “a loan will be repaid regardless of whether the loan regulations of the company will be implemented,” and “a loan application status of other financial institutions” of the written confirmation has not been written.

However, from the beginning, the Defendant was expected to obtain a double loan of KRW 131,96,00 in total from a large number of financial institutions, and around that time, the Defendant had applied for a loan from a financial institution other than three life insurance companies in the above future, and had been actually in progress on October 7, 2013; KRW 30,000,000 from a modern Capitalhouse to an enterprise bank; KRW 28,000,000 from a corporate bank; KRW 11,000 from the HK Savings Bank on October 8, 2013; KRW 9,99,000 from the (ju); KRW 8,00,000 from HK Savings; KRW 4,997,00 from the (ju); and KRW 10,000 from the loan and loan from the corporation; KRW 10,000,000 from the loan and loan; and each of the Defendant could not be reimbursed for the principal and interest of KRW 40,500,000.