logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.08 2012고단6969
사기
Text

The Defendants dismissed the application for compensation filed by the applicant for compensation.

The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is a representative director of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”), Defendant B is a person delegated by Defendant A to substantially manage the I hotel, etc. owned by H.

On January 27, 2011, at the I hotel located in Pyeongtaek-siJ, the Defendants conspiredd to enter into a lease agreement with the victim K and lessor H, lessee K, rental period of 24 months, down payment of 20 million won, and the balance of 180 million won (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

After that, when the victim K engaged in the wa Holdings business with the victim G, the Defendants maintained the lease agreement concluded with the above hotel second floor of the hotel around March 30, 201, but decided to change the lessee to K and G as the joint lessee.

However, H acquired ownership by winning an I hotel on November 17, 2010, and filed a complaint with L, a former owner of the said hotel, as a matter of unauthorized extension of the amount equivalent to 122.56 square meters in the second floor of the said hotel, at Pyeongtaek-si Office, to which the said hotel had been located, and can only use the unauthorized extension after obtaining a building change permit, and the unauthorized extension part can be used. The portion of the unauthorized extension is an important part in the wale with the portion used as a wedding ceremony, and it was difficult for victims to use the said second floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd household of the 2nd household of the 2nd household of the 2nd household.

Although the Defendants were well aware of these circumstances, in entering into a lease agreement with the victims on January 27, 201 and March 30, 2011, the Defendants did not notify the victims that the two-storys of the above hotel were not approved for use as above.

As such, the Defendants deceptioned the victim G and K, and their deceiving from January 27, 201 to February 201, 200 million won as the down payment for the lease deposit between the victim K and the first police officer from January 27, 2011.

arrow