beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Basic Facts
Around October 2011, the Defendant tried to operate the Knowledge Holdings in the name of “Fweve” from the 3th, 4, and 10th, Cheongju-si, Hoju-si E, Youngdong-gu, Cheongju-si.
At the time, D provides the place of operation of the trading center by purchasing and leasing the above building, and C provides the equipment and internal instruments necessary for the operation of the trading center, and the Defendant was operating the trading center after performing the interior work by attracting investors, etc.
However, at the time, the Defendant had a debt of 250,000,000 won or more as a bad credit holder, and there was no way to prepare the royalties because there was no person who has to make an investment in the said wa Holdings.
Criminal facts
1. From the end of October, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “H” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G would commission the victim I to undertake the interior works of the Dang-gu Open Holdings to pay KRW 9 million to the victim I at the monthly salary of the week.”
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay monthly pay to the victim even if the defendant is entrusted with the above wave Corporation.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim take advantage of the same amount as the victim, from November 1, 201 to January 13, 2012, the Defendant did not pay 95,65,400 won in total, including the monthly wage and the construction cost paid by the victim, even though he did not pay 95,65,40 won, from November 1, 201 to January 13, 201.
2. On October 201, 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim J through I at the construction site of the Heungdong-gu, Jung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and through I, to the effect that “The Defendant would pay the price by two weeks on the face of the Jeju Island.”
However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price to the victim even if the defendant had the victim do so.
Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.