logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.02.13 2019구합64709
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s business suspension disposition of 14 days against the Plaintiffs on February 11, 2019 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. Plaintiff A is an employee of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and Plaintiff B and C is an employee of F Co., Ltd.

B. On June 26, 2018, the Plaintiffs (a contact accident 1) an aircraft belonging to E (hereinafter “instant aircraft”) at the upstream of the G Airport’s ground mooring on June 26, 2018.

)를 차량으로 견인하는 업무를 수행하게 되었는데, 업무 도중 이 사건 항공기의 우측 윙릿(winglet, 비행기 주날개 끝에 부착하는 작은 날개를 의미한다

) H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”)

3) An accident that contacts the part of the aircraft that was not yet known (hereinafter “instant accident”).

At the time of the occurrence of the instant accident, Plaintiff A was on board the instant aircraft as “Cockp supervisor (sockp),” and Plaintiff B was “string driver,” and Plaintiff C was on board the instant aircraft as “Insect supervisor,” and Plaintiff C was on board the instant accident as “insect supervisor.” 2) The developments leading up to the occurrence of the instant accident are as follows.

(B) Nos. 2 and 9. ① The H-affiliated aircraft is an area designated to accommodate an aircraft for the purpose of boarding, unloading, mooring, mooring, maintenance, etc. of personnel and cargoes at the airfield No. 230 on June 26, 2018, around 07:48 at the length of 230 on June 26, 2018.

From 35 to 35 days, the vehicle was moved by the towing vehicle of the International Company, not by the engine of the aircraft but by the towing vehicle of the International Company.

On the other hand, however, there was a different aircraft in the 35th place, which is the destination.

Accordingly, H's aircraft was waiting at around 07:53 on the same day at a point that did not reach approximately 5.5m from the n3 temporary suspension location mark.

② On June 26, 2018, around 07:53, the Plaintiffs requested the control agency to instruct the route to tow the instant aircraft from the 228 cycles to the 39 cycles, and the control agency’s movement to the 39 cycles via N4 points at the 228 cycles.

arrow