A fine of KRW 2,00,00,000 for the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, and a fine of KRW 2,00,00 for the crime No. 2 in the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On August 21, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a crime of fraud at the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on one year and six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 9, 2014. On February 3, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of three years and six months for a crime of fraud at the Chuncheon District Court on February 12, 2016 and was combined on February 12, 2016, and the “the date of April 29, 2016” as stated in the indictment of the 2016 Godan169 case appears to be a clerical error.

The judgment became final and conclusive.

[Criminal facts]

1. On September 9, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highest 634,” appearing in the court No. 1 of the Incheon District Court No. 1, 2015, which was around 15:00, as a witness, on September 15, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the instant case, i.e., the implementation of the procedure for transferring the ownership of a motor vehicle to C, 5278.

The Defendant is aware that “The vehicle was not traded from February 7, 2013 to March 29, 2013, and the vehicle transaction was almost possible due to the unpaid amount, and that the vehicle was made in full deposit with the value of the vehicle.

“The foregoing vehicle price has been paid in full, and the down payment and relocation expenses of several other vehicles transacted together at the time have been paid separately, and the evidentiary materials have been submitted.

“The testimony was made.”

However, on February 7, 2013, the Defendant borrowed the name of Defendant C in the lawsuit, and purchased E from E E. E. E. E. E. E. E. from E. E. E. E. E. A. The remainder of the vehicle in E. B. B. transaction from February 7, 2013 to March 29, 2013 was used for personal purposes. From February 7, 2013 to March 29, 2013, the Defendant borrowed another’s name under the same method, and purchased more than 10 used vehicles, such as F. A. Q., etc., from D to D, and deposited some of the loans into D in the name of the down payment, etc. of the relevant vehicle. Therefore, the remainder of the vehicle in E. B. transaction was not deposited.

Accordingly, the defendant makes a false statement against his memory.