logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2020.06.12 2020고단111
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 22, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on April 22, 2009, and was sentenced to a fine of 3 million won by the same court on August 14, 2014, and was sentenced to a summary order of 7 million won by the same court on October 5, 2016.

1. On November 30, 2019, at around 21:14, the Defendant driven a “C” restaurant located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Changwon-si B from approximately 500 meters to the private distance intersection located in Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, QM6 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of about 0.216% from the 50-meter section to the private distance intersection located in Gangseo-gu, Busan Metropolitan City.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle between QM6 and QM6.

On November 30, 2019, the Defendant driven the E QM6 car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.216% around 21:14, while under the influence of alcohol, and was driving the E QM6 car with a view to an unexploied speed from the surface of the clear-distance intersection located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City D to the surface of the upper-distance intersection.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front section and the left and right of the driver and accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in driving while neglecting the duty of care as seen above while driving due to the incorrect, unsatising, walking, etc., due to the influence of alcohol, and by neglecting the above duty of care, and thereby, was driven by the Victim F (Age 42) who was in the front of the signal waiting in front of the Defendant’s proceeding direction, and was driven by the lower part of QM6’s front part of QM6’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, while driving in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, sustained injury to the victim F, such as “brain sugar,” which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and the above DNA.

arrow