logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.01.25 2016나101608
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants exceeding the money ordered to be paid under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked.

Reasons

The plaintiff is a special corporation established under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act") and carries out industrial accident compensation insurance business by being entrusted by the Minister of Employment and Labor.

C The restaurant of the trade name of C is a business place which has purchased industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and H (title B: hereinafter referred to as "reemployed") is a worker who has been in charge of delivery duties in the above restaurant.

Defendant A is the driver of the DNA (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”) and the same vice versa is the owner of the Defendant vehicle, and the Defendant D non-life insurance company is the insurer who entered into an insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.

On September 9, 2011, the victim of a traffic accident by the Defendant’s vehicle has completed delivery services and returned to the restaurant after he/she has driven an Otoba and returned to the restaurant. The vehicle driven the opposite lane and the center line along the opposite line in order to overtake the said vehicle while the vehicle stops in the traffic signal line in order to overtake the said vehicle, while driving at the first line of the traffic lane in the direction while the vehicle proceeds from the 4-distance intersection in front of the Daejeon EK2 F point to the front line of the 4-distance radius.

At the time, Defendant A tried to turn to the left at the front of K2 F point. Despite the fact that the left-hand turn signal was made, when the departure of the vehicle in front of the Defendant A delayed, Defendant A tried to turn to the left at the center of the vehicle in front of the front of the Defendant A and tried to turn to the left-hand turn in order to overtake the front vehicle. In the course of the math, there was a conflict between the front side of the front side of the victim who was driving the center line and the left side of the

(hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”). Due to the instant traffic accident, the victim suffered injury, such as 3-4, and 4-5, due to the climatic injury.

The victim who is provided with insurance benefits and the treatment for the victim shall be provided with the above injury.

arrow