1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the Plaintiff’s vehicle B Ecoos car (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”). The Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to C Pos car freight (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

B. On July 29, 2014, on the part of July 17:18, 2014, the driver of the Defendant vehicle driven the Defendant vehicle, driving the Defendant vehicle, driving the first road in front of the intersection of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box in the front of the traffic box. As a result, the driver attempted to turn to the left in advance at a point less than the distance of this case. Accordingly, the part of the part of the D driver’s right back of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was surrounded by the central line in order to overtake the Defendant vehicle, was shocked with the front part of the vehicle in front of the left side of the Defendant vehicle.

(hereinafter, the above traffic accident is referred to as "the accident of this case"). 【The ground for recognition of the accident of this case's absence of any dispute, Gap's 1 to 3 evidence, Eul's 1 and 4 evidence (including the number of pages) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the facts acknowledged prior to the occurrence of liability for damages, the location of the instant accident was a road where the center line was installed at a four-distance intersection. Thus, when the driver of the Defendant vehicle makes a left-hand turn at the said intersection, the driver of the instant accident caused the instant accident by neglecting his duty of care to prevent the instant accident by driving along the said intersection with his vehicle line, and by checking well the right and the left-hand turn after the said intersection reached the said intersection, while neglecting the duty of care to prevent the accident.

As such, the defendant is an insurance company that has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.