logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.11.14.선고 2019두48530 판결
리콜계획승인처분취소
Cases

2019Du48530 Revocation of approval for a call plan

Plaintiff Appellant

It is as shown in the attached list of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs (LLC) Law LLC, Attorneys Ha Jong-soo et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Hadge, Madge

Defendant Appellee

The Minister of Environment

Government Law Firm Corporation, Attorneys Kim Jong-soo, Lee Jong-sung, Lee In-bok, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant;

Gangwon-do, Hye-Do;

Intervenor joining the Defendant

A Stock Company

Attorney Park Jin-young, Park Young-young, Kim Jong-ho, Park Jong-hun, Counsel for the defendant-appellant-appellant

The judgment below

Seoul High Court Decision 2019Nu33769 Decided July 12, 2019

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating

November 14, 2019

Judges

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Noh Jeong-chul

Chief Justice Noh Jeong-hee

Justices Kim In-bok

arrow