Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Around 19:00 on March 6, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a CPoter Ⅱ Cargo on the part of the Defendant: (b) went back to the E convenience point in the middle apartment room in Gwangju Mine-gu; and (c) the Defendant neglected his duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by operating the vehicle before and after, and after, taking care of the duty of care to safely operate the vehicle, such as accurately operating the steering and steering equipment, and (d) neglected to do so; (b) the Defendant got the victim into the rear part of the said vehicle’s left side part of the said vehicle; (c) by taking the front part of the said vehicle’s right to the right to the traffic of the said vehicle, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt and tension, etc. in the direction of the 2-day medical treatment for about two weeks; and (d) at the same time, the Defendant damaged the said vehicle to the extent of KRW 14,368,868,86.
2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the agreement (non-prosecution of punishment) submitted by the defense counsel, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.