The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B or another vehicle.

On March 13, 2016, the Defendant was driving the above car at around 01:30 on March 13, 2016 to park in the public parking lot of 181 U.S. at his own city.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the front and rear left and right, steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the front part of the DoW 520D car, which is owned by the injured party C (W, 25 years old) who was parked later, as the back part of the DoW 520D car.

After all, the Defendant damaged the property so that the repair cost equivalent to approximately KRW 2,702,80 is required on the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, thereby harming its utility.

2. Determination of the instant violation of the Road Traffic Act is an offense that constitutes Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act and thus cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

However, according to the records of this case, it is recognized that C expressed his/her intention not to have the Defendant punished on January 3, 2017.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.