Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On January 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a cub car in B around 06:25, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of the ethroping in front of the “Eth” in front of the “Eth” in the front of the “Ethn” in the U.S. Ethrop-Pacific-dong 2:60, U.S., in the front of the said car and got the back of the Ethroping vehicle in front of the said car while driving along the two-lanes of the “Ethn” in the face of movable property at the ethic seat of the ethic seat of the P.S., the Defendant was negligent in performing the duty of the ethroping in front of the two-lane.
Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the mouth of internal walls, which require approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the above cargo vehicle to have approximately KRW 5,979,200.
2. The instant facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. Since the victim C expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the Defendant on January 21, 2016 after the instant indictment, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.