The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

1. On April 21, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 13:20 on the street in front of the building C on March 21, 2013; (b) as the victim D (54) who was living in the building was not fluoring the building despite the expiration of the lease agreement, the Defendant demanded the victim to submit the entrance door keys for the reason of the interior construction of the building; (c) however, the Defendant, even though the victim had a key to the suspension of left hand, forced the victim to grow up the key and forced him to cut down the key by force without doing so, thereby making the said victim take up the key at approximately two weeks back to the left part of the third left part, which requires a two-time medical treatment.

2. The Defendant consistently asserted that there was no injury to the victim, and denies the facts charged.

Therefore, in order to get back the keys from the victim, there is a statement and a diagnosis of the victim as to whether the victim has inflicted an injury on the victim by setting up the key to the victim's left hand in order to stop back the key.

However, there are circumstances where it is difficult to believe the victim's statement as it is.

① After the dispute between the Defendant and the victim, the victim prepared a statement (10 pages) to the effect that “the Defendant, while changing the height of the factory, extracted kis in a unfated and comprehensive kis, kiscing two fingers in that process, kisced in two fingers and kisced in that process)” (11 pages of investigation records) and, on the same day, took the key of the brush part in the field photographs (11 pages of investigation records) of the same day, and kisced the key kisc in which she was staying in the suspension of her left hand.

I do not seem to have made a statement to the effect that there is evidence for the suspension of left hand.

② Even in the investigation report (in the investigation record, 37 pages) of the investigative agency, the victim’s speech and behavior was stated as follows: “The defendant forced the defendant to take the key in his/her hand by force, and so the defendant was avoided.”