logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2014.12.05 2014고합174
강도상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 23, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for robbery, etc. in the Militarysan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on March 23, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju Prison on March 6, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 14:40 on October 4, 2014, the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to bad personality disorder, and opened a string door door, where the victim D (W, 94 years old) in Ysan-si residing in the above residence, and found the victim seated inside the house, and did not speak at all, and prevented the victim from resisting against the victim by cutting off 2-3 parts of the victim's right side eye by drinking away from 2-3 times, and then, the Defendant forced the victim to cut 1 point of gold 4.80,00 won at the market price of the victim's left hand to stop the treatment (a pair for women) and forced the victim to take one 20-day wrings, where treatment is needed for approximately 20 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Response to the E Hospital;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of punishment), copies of each judgment, investigation reports, and copies of each judgment, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the number and confinement status of individuals;

1. Relevant Article 337 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 337 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. On the basis of a criminal record not stated in the facts charged in the indictment pursuant to Article 3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Specific violent Crimes among repeated offenders, the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act (see Supreme Court Decisions 71Do2004, Dec. 21, 1971; 98Do4036, Feb. 12, 1999; hereinafter referred to as "the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Specific violent Crimes"), based on the fact of a criminal record not stated in the facts charged in the indictment, the provisions on repeated crimes stated in the applicable provisions of the

1. Article 10 (2) and (1) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation (a mental or physical disability caused by a defect in personality);

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation are as follows.

arrow