The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is as follows: (a) although the Defendant, at the time of the instant case, deducted the front door cited by the victim from the brug, thrown away him into the brug, the Defendant did not

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant can be recognized as having inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in this part of the facts charged.

① The victim consistently stated in an investigative agency and the lower court on the facts of damage.

In other words, the defendant got off the victim's front door by pushing the victim and cutting the victim's front door into the waste box.

When a victim took the form of the defendant's cell phone, the defendant tried to take the victim's cell phone, assaults the victim, and the victim suffered an injury in the part of his hand.

② The content of the victim’s photograph (the nine pages of investigation records) taken immediately after the occurrence of the instant case and the injury diagnosis certificate (the twenty pages of investigation records) issued on the following day of the instant case also conform to the victim’s statement.

(3) At an investigative agency and the court below, the witness D observed that the defendant had been injured by the victim, and that the victim had been injured by the scam and the scam immediately after the case.

The Defendant consistently made a statement (28 pages of the investigation records, 63,68 pages of the trial records). (4) The Defendant also sought a cell phone of the victim from an investigative agency to take the cell phone of the victim, and was engaged in vagabonds to take the cellular phone.

The defendant's assertion is without merit. (104 pages of investigation records) Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal for conclusion is without merit.