Jeju Bank, Inc.

Head of the tax office;

March 17, 2004

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2002Guhap30845 decided May 14, 2003

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant revoked each disposition of imposition of corporate tax of KRW 8,954,390 for the business year of 1998 against the plaintiff on December 14, 2001 (the plaintiff's assertion " December 19, 2001" seems to be erroneous) and corporate tax of KRW 6,564,580 for the business year of 1999, corporate tax of KRW 6,564,580 for the business year of 199, and corporate tax of KRW 1,065,810 for the

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reason why a party member should explain this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the deletion of the supply value that was not submitted during the third and fourth parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with the second parallel parallel parallel parallel with the second parallel parallel with the second parallel parallel with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the plaintiff's appeal.

Judges Lee Jin-jin (Presiding Judge)