Plaintiff 1 and 10 others (Law Firm Dasan et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

The Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission (Law Firm Indones, Attorneys Ba-woo, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

March 26, 2014

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap13276 decided May 2, 2013

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The Defendant’s suspension from office against Plaintiffs 1, 2, and 3 on September 2, 2011 and the suspension from office for Plaintiffs 1, 9, and 10 on September 2, 201 and the suspension from office for Plaintiffs 3, 4, 6, and 7 on March of salary reduction for Plaintiffs 2, 5, 8, and 11 shall be revoked for one-month salary reduction disposition for Plaintiffs 5, 8, and 11.

The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is reasonable, and therefore, it is accepted on the ground of this judgment in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the plaintiff's assertion in the appellate court is identical to the argument in the first instance court, and it is not acceptable as it is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and all the evidence presented in the appellate court cannot be seen differently,

Therefore, the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of reason.

Judges Yoon Sung-sung(Presiding Judge) (Presiding Judge)