beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
【Criminal Power】 On April 21, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court, and sentenced to a fine of seven million won for larceny at the Daegu District Court on August 30, 2007. On December 4, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court on October 22, 2009. On October 22, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Daegu District Court on May 4, 2012. The Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment with prison labor for attempted larceny at the Daegu District Court on August 14, 2012. On July 2, 2013, the Defendant completed the execution of the said sentence.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendant’s sole criminal defendant committed a theft of 4 smartphones from the above victim’s holding market value of KRW 800,000,000, which was habitually 6 times every six times from around the beginning of June 2014 to June 5, 2015, in the Seoul Han-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Central District Branch Office located in 405, as Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. In addition, the Defendant attempted to steal or steals property worth KRW 3,08,000, total market value of KRW 3,088,00,000, from around that time to June 5, 2015.
2. D and the Defendant for joint criminal administration, together with D (suspects of detention on July 30, 201). B around 20:00 on May 22, 2011, where the same-sex-ro 2 of Daegu Jung-gu around 20:00 is located in 174, a summary in front of the Daegu department store and the same-sex-ro.
D, taking advantage of the gapss that the victim E does not go up, D, entering the waiting room, and the defendant taken up one 30,000 won of cash, which is the victim's possession, from the waiting room to the waiting room.
In addition, the defendant brought about a total of 22,642,00 won of the market price by using the gap in the surveillance of victims at 29 times, such as the list of crimes (2) from around the above time to March 2015.
Accordingly, the defendant is habitually D.