logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2012.12.06 2012고합410
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 1997, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Daegu District Court on July 24, 1998 and ten months from the Daegu District Court on November 10, 199; imprisonment with prison labor for ten months from the Seoul Central District Court on May 13, 2003; one year and six months from the Daegu District Court on November 10, 2004; imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months from the Daegu District Court on July 6, 2006; imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months from the Daegu District Court on July 21, 2008; and imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months from the Daegu District Court on August 21, 2008 as the larceny under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes; imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months from the Daegu District Court on August 21, 2008 to the Daegu District Court on July 16, 16.

1. On August 6, 2012, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) around 16:20 on August 6, 2012, 201, placed one Belgium equivalent to KRW 400,00 in the market price of the victim, who was on the display stand, prepared in advance by using the gaps in which surveillance was neglected by other customers.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

2. On August 19, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (thief) around 13:40 on August 19, 2012, the Defendant ordered the victim’s “H bookstore” operated by the Victim G in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by ordering the victim to take a book, caused the victim to neglect surveillance, and opened the knife in the knife and took over 50,000 won in total and 40 gift certificates in the market value owned by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. The court of the defendant;

arrow