logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.23 2017고정1624
절도
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00 on August 25, 2017, at D’s clothing stores operated by the shopping company in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, worn a 189,000 Won of the market price of the clothes owned by the victim; (b) removed a stolen textet attached to a scambrogate; and (c) removed the stolen textet attached to a scambrogate; and (d) cut off the store by inserting the damaged article into a bank.

2. On September 4, 2017, around 17:30 on September 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around D operated by the shopping company located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) 3 punishment for F children’s clothes; (c) 3 punishment for F children’s boarding clothes; and (d) 233,000 won in the total market price of Frop 1 punishment; (c) entered the slope room with a trademark on which the stolen text is attached; and (d) cut off the store by putting damaged goods into the bags.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on occurrence of a crime and report on investigation (Attachment of photographs of damaged articles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentence is to be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions indicated in the trial of this case, including the fact that the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (normally favorable to the defendant) has been subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment for the same crime, but there is no record of criminal punishment, and that the damage has been completely recovered.

arrow