Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 14, 2016, between 17:45 and 18:00, the Defendant: (a) placed shopping cart in the D store located in the prime city; and (b) placed goods displayed in the store in the shopping cart.

At this time, the Defendant, using the gapss where security employees, such as E (28 taxes, women, etc.), moved the shopping camera to the cater for over-to-face display, and then collected and concealed the damaged items in advance in the shopping camera in the pre-determined inspection box.

Since then, when the defendant passed the victim D Mt Calculation Team, the defendant calculated the goods contained in the shopping cart using the fact that the crime prevention mark is not sounding, and the damaged goods loaded in the inspection screen room were stolen with a 18,300 won market price, which was displayed at the same time under the method of not calculating the amount.

The Defendant stolen the property amounting to the total amount of KRW 245,250,000, in total, six times, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that CCTV CDs (the Defendant and his defense counsel did not steals the damaged articles other than the damaged articles listed in the attached list 6 times.

However, according to the evidence mentioned above, the defendant's defense is not acceptable since the defendant's materials, such as the facts charged, can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant stored the damaged materials in a bank and stolen them.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;