1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) regarding the principal lawsuit that exceeds the amount ordered to be paid below.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties to the principal lawsuit and the counter-claim common facts, or the records and images of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 17, 19, 20, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 11, 12, and 14 (including any numbers if they are not specially indicated; hereinafter the same shall apply), Samsung Seoul Hospital at the court of first instance, Samsungnam Hospital at the court of first instance, the research results on the evaluation entrusted to the president of the Ethtory University at the National University, the Mayor of the Ethtory University at the National Health Insurance Corporation, the Mayor of the Ethtory University at the National Health Insurance Corporation, and the head of the Daegu Water Hospital at the court of first instance at the university of Ethtory and the head of the Daegu Water Hospital at the National Health Insurance Corporation. There is no counter-proof evidence.

The plaintiff hospital is a corporation established to promote medical development and improve national health through research and treatment of medical science and dental medicine.

Defendant B is a patient who received treatment at the Plaintiff hospital due to symptoms, such as dystrophy, telegraph, etc., and Defendant C is a partner and guardian of Defendant B.

B. Prior to October 18, 2008 (the date of hospitalization), Defendant B was a male male, who was suffering from nuclear exposure (three casualties) and tuberculosis, but did not have any other disease, such as high blood pressure and urology. Around 2005, Defendant B showed high blood pressure, trajectal symptoms, and had been hospitalized at the F Hospital located in Daegu (former G Hospital) (the year of 64 years old), considering overall symptoms from the summer (the year of 2007). (2) Defendant B was hospitalized at the hospital located in Daegu (the year of 64 years old), due to the aggravation of symptoms, the left side side part of the symptoms, the mouth disorder, the mouth disorder, and the dynassis, etc., and the medical team of the Plaintiff hospital applied to the emergency hospital of the Plaintiff on June 1, 2008. The medical team diagnosed the Defendant B by performing the above dynaculsis, the above humcsis, the above hump treatment and the above 3 pharmacologic treatment.

Plaintiff

On June 9, 2008, the hospital conducted brain CT inspections in relation to Defendant B's sexual typhical typhism.