1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,500,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from July 22, 2010 to September 18, 2014.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, on July 22, 2010, who had received a basin expansion surgery using the food and flood bags around 2004, was performed with the removal of the infected water and the correction of the basin sewage from the crypary surgery operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) through the cryposisr on July 22, 2010, and was performed with the removal of the infected water and the correction of the basin sewage.

8. On the 30th of the same month as the 6th of the same month, one received a basin extension alcohol through local transplantation.

B. At present, there was an anti-defluoral sponsor, promulsion, and debrising to the Plaintiff.

(c) After the discharge of a re-flosion, the removal of a re-flosion shall be re-floated after the removal of a re-flosion by cutting off the re-flosion at the time of the extension of a re-flosion, by cutting off the re-flosion, skin structure, and floating the float, making the re-flo

따라서 보형물이 클 경우에는 유방의 쭈글거림이 있을 수 있고, 유방 크기가 작아질 수도 있다. 라.

In the case of the local transplantation, the same quantity of the local transplant can be absorbing the same quantity, and the collapse of the transplantd area or oil reciting may occur as it does not absorb the transplantd area.

[Ground of recognition] The records of Gap evidence, the result of the commission of the examination of the medical records to the head of the Badong Hospital attached to the Egysian University, the result of the commission of the physical examination to the head of the Seoul Egysian University, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) The plaintiff asserts that the difference in the size of the left left and right door, and the difference in the height of the right and right door, after the operation was performed by the defendant.

However, there is no evidence to prove that there is a difference in the height of the wheels.

In addition, according to the result of the court's entrustment of physical examination to the director of the Seoul Escar Hospital, it is difficult to view the Plaintiff as a malicious result in the medical malpractice lawsuit, since it can be acknowledged that the Plaintiff is a scarcity, but the correction is unnecessary.

Therefore, this part of the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

(2) In the above basic facts.