beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.
(e).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 7, 2015, from around 04:40 to 05:00 on the same day, the Defendant committed violent acts, such as booming a boom in the situation where the Defendant was in Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, 513 Dong 1501, and 112 reported and sent to the Seoul Labor Relations Commission C District D, and police officers E, and attempted to put the F into a boom.
The Defendant, “I”, “I am, I am off, I am off, I am off,” and tried to keep B, E’s chests and s, and continued to be F, and assaulted by the Defendant, her hand and body, such as the above D and E’s chests.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of crimes and 112 report processing duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution of official duties (Article 62(1) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties) (Article 6-1 of June-1 and April) where the basic area (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Performance of Official Duties) (Article 62(1) (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties) (Article 6-1 of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties) is minor;
However, when the defendant committed the crime of this case, he repented and reflected his mistake, and the defendant is only two times before and after the fine, and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered.