A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On January 27, 2015, at around 01:10, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports in front of D in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, and prevented the Defendant from assaulting G; (b) assaulted the Defendant on one occasion at the right eye of the above F.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the 112 reported case handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] : The scope of sentence comparison between the punishment and the recommended punishment for the basic area (six to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties: six to one year [Pronouncement Decision] as the crime of obstruction of official duties committed in June to one year and four months (a crime detrimental to the function of the State by nullifying legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish it in order to establish the legal order of the State and eradicate the light of public authority.

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case, who has committed the crime of this case, repented and reflected his mistake, and the defendant has been subject to a fine of one time and a majority of juvenile care reports, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, circumstances after the crime of this case, etc. shall be determined as ordered by the order.