Text
1. On September 10, 2018, the Defendant’s decision on the non-approval of an additional injury or disease against the Plaintiff is revoked.
2. The plaintiff's remainder.
Reasons
1. Case history
A. The occurrence of the instant accident and the Plaintiff’s medical care ① The Plaintiff (B male) served as a delivery engineer, and around September 11, 2017, around 13:47, the Plaintiff (B male) was diagnosed by C Hospital as having been diagnosed as having been under the first disease of this case, by putting the articles to be delivered to the customer in the third floor warehouse of the company around September 11, 2017, putting the steel stairs out, extinguishing the steel stairs, and falling into the ground floor below 2.5m in vaddi (hereinafter “instant accident”).
② Upon obtaining approval from the Defendant for medical care benefits for the first injury and disease of this case, the Plaintiff received medical care benefits from September 11, 2017 to March 31, 2018 at C Hospital.
(2) The duration of hospitalization shall be five days). (2)
A decision on non-approval of part of the medical treatment plan was made, ① The Plaintiff continuously complained of the head, the fluence, the right finger, and the symptoms of low-satis during the period of the above medical treatment. On March 22, 2018, C hospital doctor submitted a medical treatment plan to the head of the Ansan branch, who belongs to the Defendant, for the purpose of extending the period of the Plaintiff’s medical treatment for three months, on the ground of “the medical treatment and transitional observation” from April 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018.
② On April 20, 2018, the head of the Ansan branch office affiliated with the Defendant decided to reduce the scheduled treatment period until May 31, 2018, on the ground that “the Plaintiff’s present condition is judged as able to be terminated due to the increase of the conditions after treatment until May 31, 2018” with respect to the Plaintiff.
(hereinafter referred to as “non-approval disposition of this case’s medical treatment plan”
On July 31, 2018, after the period of the above medical care expires, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by C Hospital No. 4-5-6-7 (hereinafter “the instant additional disease”), and was subject to the “compact and spactact between the former and the latter” (No. 4-5-6-7) at C Hospital No. 4-5 (hereinafter “the instant additional disease”).